collaborative development, and that features such as allowing easy access to past versions of a page favor "creative construction" over "creative destruction". Retrieved March 25, 2007. (Gale, 2006.) Child, Maxwell., "Professors Split on Wiki Debate" Archived December 20, 2008, at the Wayback Machine, The Harvard Crimson, February 26, 2007. "Wikimedia Foundation employee ousted over paid editing".
Eskort Sto: Plus size underkläder tantra massage i malmö
|Black escort stockholm sex dejt
|Gratis sexvideos sex movies free
||Tantrisk massage stockholm shemale eskort
|Dejtingsajt svenska erotiska filmer
|Sex halmstad thaimassage stockholm billigt
||Swingers köpenhamn kåta svenska tjejer
|Escort helsingfors svensk sex tube
||"The Visual Side of Wikipedia" (PDF). There was a decline of about 2 billion between December 2012 and December 2013. "Wikimedia pornography row deepens as Wales cedes rights BBC News". Doi :.1007/ _53. "Wikipedia: 'A Work in Progress.
Exotic Female Relaxation Massage.
Although disputes usually arise from a disagreement between two opposing views on how an article should read, the Arbitration Committee explicitly refuses to directly rule on the specific view that should be adopted. Access to content Content licensing When the project was started in 2001, all text in Wikipedia was covered by the GNU Free Documentation License (gfdl a copyleft license permitting the redistribution, creation of derivative works, and commercial use of content. As of May 2019, the six largest, in order of article count, are the English, Cebuano, Swedish, German, French, and Dutch Wikipedias. He described it as "a work of reference as useful as any in existence with so wide a range that it is almost impossible to find a person, place or thing that it has left uncovered, and. 158 As a consequence of the open structure, Wikipedia "makes no guarantee of validity" of its content, since no one is ultimately responsible for any claims appearing. "The contribution conundrum: Why did Wikipedia succeed while other encyclopedias failed?".
72 In certain cases, all editors are allowed to submit modifications, but review is required for some editors, depending on certain conditions. "Multilingual historical narratives on Wikipedia". Others use more traditional peer review, such as Encyclopedia of Life and the online wiki encyclopedias Scholarpedia and Citizendium. Another example is Wapedia, which began to display Wikipedia content in a mobile-device-friendly format before Wikipedia itself did. Governance Further information: Wikipedia:Administration Wikipedia's initial anarchy integrated democratic and hierarchical elements over time. Simonite alleges some Wikipedians use the labyrinthine rules and guidelines to dominate others and those editors have a vested interest in keeping the status quo. "Toward a New Compendium of Knowledge (longer version. 348 Research use Wikipedia has been widely used as a corpus for linguistic research in computational linguistics, information retrieval and natural language processing. 20 Wikipedia has been criticized for exhibiting systemic bias, for presenting a mixture of "truths, half truths, and some falsehoods 21 and for being subject to manipulation and spin in controversial topics. Dewey, Caitlin (December 2, 2015).
Plus size underkläder tantra massage i malmö - Escort Gothenburg Free
"A topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject." No original research. "Wikipedia family feud rooted in San Diego". 38 Nupedia and Wikipedia coexisted until the former's servers were taken down permanently in 2003, and its text was incorporated into Wikipedia. 271 There are German- and Spanish-language versions as well. Media files covered by free content licenses (e.g. In 2012 Wikivoyage, an editable travel guide, and Wikidata, an editable knowledge base, launched. "The Authority of Wikipedia" (PDF). "The Mysterious Workings of Wikis: Who Owns What?". 220 In 2014, a female editor who requested a separate space on Wikipedia to discuss improving civility had her proposal referred to by a male editor using the words "the easiest way to avoid being called a cunt is not to act like one". A plus size underkläder tantra massage i malmö
b c Yasseri, Taha; Spoerri, Anselm; Graham, Mark; Kertesz, Janos (May 23, 2013 The Most Controversial Topics in Wikipedia: A Multilingual and Geographical Analysis by Taha Yasseri, Anselm Spoerri, Mark Graham, Janos Kertesz : ssrn, arXiv : 1305.5566, doi :.2139/ssrn.2269392. Beyond legal matters, the editorial principles of Wikipedia are embodied in the "five pillars" and in numerous policies and guidelines intended to appropriately shape content. 117 Editors who do not log in are in some sense second-class citizens on Wikipedia, 117 as "participants are accredited by members of the wiki community, who have a vested interest in preserving the quality of the work product. Helm, Burt (December 13, 2005). The Sydney Morning Herald. 125 Andrew Lih, a professor and scientist, wrote in The New York Times that the reason he thought the number of male contributors outnumbered the number of females so greatly, is because identifying as a feminist may expose oneself to "ugly. The root problem: anti-elitism, or lack of respect for expertise. Retrieved January 28, 2007. Overall, Wikipedia comprises more than 40 million articles in 301 different languages 15 and by February 2014 it had reached 18 billion page views and nearly 500 million unique visitors per month. A b Elder, Jeff (June 16, 2014). 162 Critics argue that Wikipedia's open nature and a lack of proper sources for most of the information makes it unreliable. "Microsoft offers cash for Wikipedia edit". Retrieved November 6, 2012. "comScore MMX Ranks Top 50 US Web Properties for August 2012". 238 The feature was changed from opt-out to opt-in afterward. Cohen, Noam (March 28, 2009). Public Information Research, Wikipedia Watch Raphel, JR (August 26, 2009). 257 In 2016, the level of contributions were reported by Bloomberg News as being at 77 million annually, updating the Jaffe estimates for the higher level of support to between.08 million and.2 million annually. Directly after the posted web interview, the representatives stated that Wikimedia would be applying an all-inclusive approach to accommodate as many mobile access systems as possible in its efforts for expanding general mobile access, including BlackBerry and the Windows. 42 Around 1,800 articles were added daily to the encyclopedia in 2006; by 2013 that average was roughly 800.